This a three year research project investigating the emergence of carbon markets in a number of places as a response to climate change. It does so through the two themes of governance and legitimacy. Research on novel forms of global governance suggests that these two themes are particularly pertinent in understanding the dynamics of these mechanisms and the dilemmas their promoters face. How should such markets be governed in order to assure they pursue emissions reductions effectively? How do actors respond to recurrent claims that this sort of response is illegitimate and/or ineffective? What is required for carbon markets to achieve legitimacy?
The research pursues these questions in three ways. First, it will examine the development of carbon markets in Canada (both at federal and provincial levels), especially in comparison with similar processes in Australia and the United States. Second, it will examine the development of policy networks promoting emissions trading since the early 1990s. Third, it will examine proposals for carbon market development as they unfold as countries negotiate a successor to the Kyoto Protocol.
The research will contribute to academic debates about the changing character of global governance. The research will also contribute to ongoing debates about appropriate responses to climate change.
The project is a SSHRC-funded project from 2009-2012. Matthew Paterson is the principal investigator. The other researchers are Steven Bernstein and Matthew Hoffmann, at the University of Toronto, and Michele Betsill at Colorado State University.
Diasporas and development: Emigration as a factor of development is increasingly recognized in policy circles and in global financial institutions. To emigration as remittances, was added in recent years the potential of diasporas, as a source of development that is stable and promising. This is at least how it is perceived by states of origin, international organizations and even by states of destination. This research project in collaboration with professor Beveley Mullings (Geography, Queen’s University) studies the evolution of the conceptualization of diasporas in initiatives and strategies of development of less developed countries, in order to understand the place that this phenomenon occupies in the global political economy today.
Issues of perspectives in the study of International Relations. The study of perspective is constituting an increasingly important issue in IR scholarship. But so far this interest has been limited to English speaking publications, not covered in French. This project, in the form of an edited book on issues of perspectives in French, seeks to explore what other perspectives there are beyond the Anglo-Saxon views of the world. It explores perspectives from other regions of the world and seeks to develop theoretical and epistemological thinking on this issue.
Mobility in the world political economy. For many years migration and mobility have been studied in relations to governance, to regulation and controls of mobility. But the study of mobility trends from the economic side and from the conditions of production are more neglected, as if they have remained constant or as if they only facilitate the natural inclination of people to move. This research project, still in its formulation, seeks to analyse the global organization of production and its effects on three economic sectors: agriculture, textile and garment, and the public work sector. In their global structuration, these sectors create new conditions of mobility that are then articulated and modified by people and by governments. The results of this study would serve to improve our understanding of the various dynamics of mobility and the relative influence of state regulations.
In the years since the global financial crisis first struck in 2007, policymakers have proclaimed economic emergencies, introduced extraordinary measures and argued for various temporary, exceptional policies. Thirty years earlier, during the economic crises of the 1970s and early 1980s, policymakers used similar language to justify the extremely high interest rates that they used to squeeze inflation out the economy. Although there is a rich analytic literature on these economic crises, very few commentators have focused on the exceptionalist character of such claims and policies. At the same time, a growing literature in the field of critical security studies emphasizes the importance of exceptionalist claims and policies in the security realm, particularly in the wake of 9/11; yet that literature pays almost no attention to the role of economic exceptionalism.
This SSHRC-funded project seeks to bridge this gap in the literature by examining how governments use exceptionalist politics in their response to economic crises. In doing so, this research promises to provide important and original insights into how crises produce political and economic change and how and when democratic governments suspend the rules in times of crisis.
Large markets tend to dominate the global economy’s governance. In the realm of global financial governance, however, the European Union (EU) has, until recently, had little influence; it is the United States that has largely dominated the setting of international financial rules and regulations. Nevertheless, by centralizing its rule-making in matters of financial regulation, the EU has managed to increase its influence vis-à-vis the US in matters of international financial governance over the last decade. The area where this change has been most visible and pronounced is international accounting standards. The current research examines the EU’s rise as a global actor in governing global finance from the perspective of accounting standards. In doing so, it studies the EU’s relationship with the US and the International Accounting Standards Board, the international organization responsible for setting international financial reporting standards (IFRS). Finally, it analyses how the EU’s adoption of IFRS in the early 2000s set the ball in motion for the globalization of accounting standards.
The purpose of this research project is to determine and explain the extent to which a structural shift in financial power from the north Atlantic area to Asia is taking place, whereby the governance of global finance may no longer be mainly a (northern) transatlantic affair, as it has been the case since 1945. As such, the research will provide solid ground to assess the future shape and content of global financial governance, including the role and influence of international institutions such as, for example, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the Financial Stability Board, the International Accounting standards Board and the International Monetary Fund. In turn, this assessment will inform our view of the world financial system’s prospects for stability, which is a prerequisite for economic prosperity. Finally, the project will provide a better understanding of the role that middle powers like Canada do and can play in governing global finance, especially in a context where Asian countries like China and India are gaining financial power at the expense of the European Union and the United States.